Examples and application Hyperpersonal model

^ lee bee hian; sim li chuan; tan mon kiat trevor; benjamin h. detenber (2006). getting know you: exploring development of relational intimacy in computer-mediated communication article first published online: 23 jun 2006
^ traci anderson; tara emmers-sommer (2006). predictors of relationship satisfaction in online romantic relationships. communication studies. vol 57, no. 2, june 2006, pp. 153-172.
^ duthler, kirk w. (2006). politeness of requests made via email , voicemail: support hyperpersonal model. journal of computer-mediated communication, 500-521.
^ l. crystal jiang, natalie n. bazarova, jeffrey t. hancock. disclosure–intimacy link in computer-mediated communication: attributional extension of hyperpersonal model. article first published online: 22 dec 2010. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01393.x
^ turner, j. w.; grube, j. a.; meyers, j. (june 2001). developing optimal match within online communities: exploration of cmc support communities , traditional support . journal of communication: 231–251. doi:10.1093/joc/51.2.231. 
^ robinson, j. d.; turner, j. (2003). impersonal, interpersonal, , hyperpersonal social support: cancer , older adults . health communication. 15 (2): 227–234. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc1502_10. 
^ henderson, s.; gilding, m. (2004). ve never clicked in life : trust , hyperpersonal communication in online friendships . new media & society. 6 (4): 487–506. doi:10.1177/146144804044331. 
^ high, a. c.; caplan, s. e. (2008). social anxiety , computer-mediated communication during initial interactions: implications hyperpersonal perspective . computers in human behavior. 25 (2009): 475–482. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.10.011. 
^ pena, j.; walther, j.b.; hancock, j.t. (2007). effects of geographic distribution on dominance perceptions in computer-mediated group . communication research. 34: 313–331. doi:10.1177/0093650207300431. 
^ wickham, k.r.; walther, j.b. (2007). perceived behaviors of emergent , assigned leaders in virtual groups . international journal of e-collaboration. 35: 59–85. 
^ wang, sharon; shin ii moon (march 2010). face off: implications of visualcues on initiatingfriendship on facebook . computers in human behavior. 26 (2): 226–234. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.001. 
^ gonzales, amy; jeffrey hancock (17 february 2011). mirror, mirror on facebook wall: effects of exposure facebook on self-esteem . cyberpsychology, behavior, , social networking. 1–2. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0411. 
^ whitty, monica (2010). truth, lies & trust on internet. 
^ toma, catalina l (2012). perceptions of trustworthiness online: role of visual , textual information . proceedings of 2010 acm conference on computer supported cooperative work: 13–22. doi:10.1145/1718918.1718923. 
^ blanchard, anita (september 2008). testing model of sense of virtual community . computers in human behavior. 24 (5): 2107–2123. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.10.002. 
^ underwood, jean d.m (september 2011). lies tell , us: using behaviouralcharacteristics explainfacebookactivity . computers in human behavior. 27 (5): 1621–1626. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.01.012. 
^ andersen, tracy (21 august 2006). predictors of relationship satisfaction in online romantic relationships . communication studies. 57 (2): 153–172. doi:10.1080/10510970600666834. 
^ walther, joseph (17 march 2006). group , interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration . human communication research. 23 (3): 342–369. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00400.x.